<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[fayetteville nc criminal lawyer - Beaver Courie Law Firm]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.beavercourie.com/blog/tags/fayetteville-nc-criminal-lawyer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.beavercourie.com/blog/tags/fayetteville-nc-criminal-lawyer/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Beaver Courie Law Firm's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 21:58:05 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Shooting into Occupied Vehicle Charges in Fayetteville]]></title>
                <link>https://www.beavercourie.com/blog/shooting-into-occupied-vehicle-charges-in-fayetteville/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.beavercourie.com/blog/shooting-into-occupied-vehicle-charges-in-fayetteville/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Beaver Courie Law Firm]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:58:50 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[discharging weapon]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[fayetteville nc criminal lawyer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[shooting into occupied building]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[shooting into occupied vehicle]]></category>
                
                
                
                    <media:thumbnail url="https://beavercourie-com.justia.site/wp-content/uploads/sites/909/2021/08/Shooting-into-Occupied-Vehicle-Charges-in-Fayetteville-NC.jpg" />
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Accusations of discharging a “barreled weapon” are serious criminal charges. As set forth in NCGS Chapter 14-34.1, shooting into occupied vehicle charges in Fayetteville (and buildings, structures, aircraft, etc.) are felony criminal allegations. The law is intended to be broadly applied. It includes a wide range of “conveyances” and enclosures, devices, and equipment. The purpose&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Accusations of discharging a “barreled weapon” are serious criminal charges.  As set forth in NCGS Chapter 14-34.1, shooting </p>



<p> into occupied vehicle charges in Fayetteville (and buildings, structures, aircraft, etc.) are felony criminal allegations. 
The law is intended to be broadly applied. It includes a wide range of “conveyances” and enclosures, devices, and equipment.  
The purpose of the criminal law is to protect people (occupants) of different properties “from being shot at.”  
</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p><em>Anytime a gun is pointed at someone and fired, the NC Criminal Laws deem that a crime of violence. The potential for serious bodily harm, or death, make prison time a very real consideration – David Courie, Fayetteville Criminal Defense Attorney </em></p>
</blockquote>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-what-is-required-for-a-conviction">What is required for a Conviction?  </h2>



<p>
Defense lawyers in Fayetteville NC and attorneys who handle criminal charges in North Carolina, refer to the “essential elements” of the crime to include things like:   
</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The person charged (the “Defendant”) </li>



<li>Wantonly and willfully discharges  </li>



<li>A “firearm” (barreled weapon)  </li>



<li>Into some “Property”  </li>



<li>That is “occupied” </li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-what-does-into-property-mean">What does “Into Property” mean?  </h2>



<p>
<a href="https://www.ncleg.gov/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/BySection/Chapter_14/GS_14-34.1.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">N.C.G.S. 14-34.1(b)</a> is written in such a way as to include different types of property and extensions of the property.   
</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p><em>One way to think about it is buildings, properties, and structures that contain people are included under the law. That may be cars, trucks, airplanes, houses, and workspaces – David Courie, Defense Lawyer Fayetteville NC </em></p>
</blockquote>



<p>
Discharging certain barreled weapons or a firearm into occupied property include, as set forth by the General Assembly any enclosure, erection, equipment, device, aircraft, vehicle, building structure, or other conveyance.  
</p>



<p><strong><a href="/practice-areas/criminal-defense/assault-charges/assault-by-pointing-a-gun/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Assault by Pointing Gun Charges </a></strong></p>



<p>
A conveyance is a vehicle that transports something or someone to and from places.   
In a recent case before the NC Court of Appeals, the Defendant in <em>North Carolina v. Robert Louis Staton</em>, challenged the “into property” element of the law.  
In that case, the Defendant allegedly shot a weapon towards a truck traveling on a roadway.  The bullet struck a toolbox located in the back bed of the truck.  
It did not technically strike the exterior body panel of the truck.  The bullet did not pierce the body panel.   
<em>State v. Canady, </em>191 NC App 680, sets forth the essential element of “into property” is met if a bullet damages the exterior of a building or structure.  
There does not need to be documentation or evidence that a bullet penetrates the building, vehicle, or structure.  
</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-is-specific-intent-required-for-shooting-into-occupied-vehicle-charges">Is Specific Intent required for Shooting into Occupied Vehicle Charges?  </h2>



<p>
The <em>mens rea</em> (evil “intent”) required for Shooting into Occupied Vehicle Charges requires the accused of criminal wrongdoing merely to shoot a firearm <em>at an occupied </em>building.   
Specific intent is not required to shoot into the occupied vehicle, structure, conveyance, or building.   
</p>



<p>Fayetteville Criminal Defense Lawyer </p>



<p>
If the State presents evidence the Defendant discharged a firearm at a person entering an occupied building (or vehicle or structure or conveyance) with a bullet, that is enough for a felony conviction.  
</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p><em>The reason behind the law, the purpose, is to protect people from death or other serious bodily injuries – David Courie, Cumberland County Criminal Defense Lawyer </em></p>
</blockquote>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-what-is-the-standard-of-review-for-appeals">What is the Standard of Review for Appeals?  </h2>



<p>
In determining whether the State presents enough evidence for a conviction, the Court of Appeals reviews such matters <em>de novo </em>or anew. 
It does not consider a Superior Court Judge’s ruling for Abuse of Discretion.  The Appellate Court may reverse the trial judge’s denial of a Motion to Dismiss if it had come to a different conclusion. 
Having said that, in ruling on a Motion to Dismiss for lack or insufficient evidence, the Court reviews:  
</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Whether there is evidence deemed “substantial” of each essential element  </li>



<li>Of the charge or a lesser included offense of the charge  </li>



<li>AND the accused (the Defendant) is the perpetrator  </li>
</ul>



<p>
The Court must consider the evidence adduced and admitted at trial, <em>in the light most favorable to the State</em>.  The State benefits from “every reasonable inference” of the evidence properly admitted.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>